About the true history of ancient Rus'. How was a prince or king elected in pre-Christian Rus'? Tatar-Mongol yoke: alternative history

Did you know that tsarist rule in Rus' was not inherited until Christianization?

In Rus' they lived according to the Cop Law, where only those who proved, not in word but in deed, that they were a normal, smart man, a family man, and not a drunk or some kind of loafer, had a voice. A craftsman, such as a carver of wood blanks. Here 10 such men unanimously(!) chose the ten's man, the ten's men chose the sot's man, etc. to the Monarch, whose power was not inherited! Those. the best of the best was chosen and, seeing him, the people said Tse Zarya (Tse (tse - this, this) ZAR (Dawn - Bringer of Light)), which was later shortened to “Tsar”. Children born to kings were called Tse Sarevich (Tse Zarevich). That is, it is the same as the son of the dawn. From the Etruscans (the Russian ethnic group is one of our clans), the Latins adopted this concept and called their rulers Caesar (Caesar). This is where there was freedom of speech, will and democracy of elections.

And who teaches us democracy today? Those who imposed royal power and totalitarianism a thousand years ago.

About taxes in Rus'

The tax was in the form of a tithe, i.e. everyone paid tithes. Those. The 10th part of 144. Now, instead of 144, 100 (%) is taken. To recalculate the tithe in a modern way, let's make a proportion: 144/10 = 100/x. Hence x = 10·100/144 = 7 (%). The tithe went to support the Cossacks (“konik seeing”) and the construction of border towns to protect our lands from invaders. One of the Cossack camps is now called KazakhStan, this happened after the October Revolution, although even before the revolution it was called the Cossack Stan (KazakStan). The Cossacks were skilled warriors, and they were even hired by the Japanese emperors; the samurai probably did not reach the level of our Ancestors.

History of Rus'

Our modern official history, taught in schools, took its final form in the 18th and 19th centuries AD. and was written in accordance with the biblical concept of history, commissioned by the Romanovs. Thus, today we are taught from an early age that our history is only a little over 1000 years old. Allegedly, the brothers Cyril and Methodius benefited the dark and wild pagans by giving them writing.

Let's see what happened and who falsified our past and how.

Let's start with Tsar Peter the Great, who instead of “Summer” introduced “Years” and in Summer 7208 from S.M.Z.H (Creation of the World in the Star Temple, where the creation of the world was previously understood as the signing of a peace treaty) on December 20, Peter I postponed the New Year having issued a decree to congratulate each other on January 1st “on the new Got,” and to introduce a new foreign Julian calendar, where after December 31st, 7208 from S.M. began on January 1, 1700 from the birth of Christ. Thus, he easily and simply stole 5508 years of history from us.

Since our Ancestors wrote numbers in initial letters, then our writing, at least, has existed for more than 7.5 thousand years, as Catherine II wrote in her “Notes on Russian History”: “... the Slavs of ancient Nestor had a written language...”.

But the worst thing happened during Christianization, when in Rus' the monuments of pre-Christian writing and culture of ancient Rus'-Russia-Russia were subjected to total destruction.

About the “Grand” Prince Vladimir Krasno Solnyshko

The illegitimate son of the Khazar woman Malushi, Prince Vladimir, who illegally took the Kiev throne (by poisoning the legitimate heirs) introduced an alien religion with fire and sword. During the years from 988 to 1000, ¾ of the population of Kievan Rus was destroyed, after which only 3 million of the original 12 million population remained. The survivors were mostly children and old people. Children deprived of parents were brought up in the Christian spirit, while denying the entire great Heritage of their Ancestors.

The Higher Clergy of Belovodye (the center of Belovodye was in Asgard, modern Omsk), the sacred land of Russia-Rus-Russia in 1222 AD decided to create a special governing body to protect the Old Faith, which became known as: OR-DEN, which meant “Strength Sveta” or “Light Power”, where the Kh'ary rune “OR” meant “strength” in the ancient Slavic language, the rune “DEN” meant “light”. This Light Power came from beyond the Urals in the form of retribution to the Russian lands, devastated and captured by the Greek-Jewish-Christians.

Tatar-Mongol yoke

This word “Order” was distorted by the Latins as “Orde”, and history writers changed it to the word “horde” and the Great Horde or the Mongol-Tatar yoke appeared. Foreigners called Rus' Mongolia. The very name “Mongolia” (or Mogolia, as, for example, Karamzin and many other authors write) comes from the Greek word “Megalion”, i.e. "Great". The word “Mongolia” (“Mogolia”) does not appear in Russian historical sources. But there is “Great Rus'”. The word “Igo” means order, hence the name “Igor” - the keeper of order. “Thief” is an enemy, i.e. Tatar is the enemy of the Aryan. Who could Aryan be an enemy of? Could he be an enemy of the Rasichs, i.e. to your brothers in the Clans of the Great RACE? No. The only enemy he had was those who wanted to enslave these families. That’s why they write in their history (iz-tor-ya) that in Rus' (and they considered only Kievan and surrounding lands to be Russia, and “Kievan Rus” was invented by M. Pogodin, who in his dissertation “On the Origin of Rus'” ( 1825), as well as Messrs. G. Bayer, later G. Miller and A. Schlötzer substantiated the Norman theory of the emergence of Russian statehood: “come and rule with us”) the Great Horde went, or in other words - the Mongol-Tatars - the Great Enemies of the Aryans, not converted to Christianity. And they came from the East of Russeniya (Russeniya is the territory where the Clans of the Great Race settled), more precisely from Siberia, which in those days from the Urals to the Pacific Ocean and from the Cold Ocean to Central India was called Tarkhtaria, the land of which is patronized by the Gods - son and daughter of Perun, brother and sister, Tarkh, nicknamed Dazhdbog (Giving God), and his Younger sister Tara. Our Ancestors told foreigners: “...we are the children of Tarkh and Tara...”. Later, Tarkhtaria became Tartaria, and the biblical people, who had difficulty pronouncing the letter “r,” called it Tataria.

Let's look at the 1754 map “I-e Carte de l’Asie”

Across the entire vast territory of the Russian Empire, right up to the Pacific Ocean, including Mongolia, the Far East, etc., there is an inscription in large letters: Grande Tartaria, that is, Great Tartaria.

Now it is clear that the words “Tatary” and “Tatar” had nothing to do with modern Tatars until after the revolution of 1917, historians of biblical nationality decided to falsify the “trace of the Mongol-Tatar yoke” in order to confirm with another deception, substitution of concepts his fictitious story about the invasion of Rus' by an enemy that never existed and to divert suspicion from himself as a real enemy.

They carried out this plan to declare someone a former enemy for about a decade and a half, and it was completed by Lazar Moiseevich Koganovich in 1935, declaring several peoples Tatars: the Volga Bulgarians or Bulgars, baptized people, Uighurs, as well as Siberians. Thus, in recent history, another substitution of names and concepts was carried out.

Once upon a time, in the northeast of the Black Sea there was Khazaria, which launched predatory and predatory attacks on neighboring peoples. One day, Khazaria captured the Volga lands with their peace-loving peoples and subjugated them. But some of the Volga Bulgars did not want to submit to the power of the Khazars, and they, together with their khan (i.e. military leader) Astarukh, moved to the Danube, built their cities there and still live there - these territories are called Bulgaria. But note that modern historiography classifies the Danube Bulgarians as Slavs, and their eastern brothers - the Volga, Kazan Bulgarians - as Turks - as Tatars.

What caused this division? Yes, due to the fact that from Constantinople Christianity was imposed on the Danube, and Islam was imposed up to the Volga. And since in ancient times Islam was accepted mainly by Turkic tribes, therefore the Volga Bulgarians began to be classified as Turks, although they were in fact Slavic tribes who at first did not accept Christianity, but then Islam was forcibly imposed on many of their tribes.

However, among them there were tribes that did not recognize either Islam or Christianity, and many, especially along Vyatka and higher, and closer to the Caspian Sea, remained in their ancient faith of their Ancestors and lived separately. That's why they still call themselves White Bulgarians.

Why don’t modern Russian children receive this knowledge at school?

Yes, again, because the modern official version of the history of the Russian people was finally formalized in the 18-19th century and was written in strict accordance with the biblical picture of the world: they say that there is the most ancient, God-chosen people - the Jews, and the Russians were Greeks (Semites) before their Christianization ) wild pagans, and even writing was given to the Russians by the Greek monks Cyril and Methodius.

In fact, the semi-literate monks Cyril and Methodius reduced the Slavic Initial Letter (Az God Vedai, Vedai Verb Good... - one of the types of our writing that existed in Rus' many thousands of years before Christ) from 49 letters to 44, and four of the remaining letters were given Greek names that do not contain such sound images. It was precisely those letters from the old Initial Letter that were destroyed that had no correspondence in the Greek language.

Greek is built on the basis of simplified Phoenician, and Phoenician is based on Scythian, and Scythian is our Slavic, because. Scythians are one of the Slavic tribes. Yaroslav the Wise, with his “wisdom,” removed another letter. The reformer Peter the First removed five letters, Nicholas the Second – three, Lunacharsky – three, introduced “Ё” and removed images from the ABC (Az, Buki, Vedi...) and introduced phonemics (a, b, c...) and the ABC became the Alphabet (alpha +vita - in the Greek manner) and our mighty language became without image (ugly).

Materials taken from the site energodar.net/nasledie/tartariya.html

Our workshop produces wooden blanks for painting in the Nizhny Novgorod region. RuTvor wooden blanks are ideal for creativity, for painting, burning, decoupage, in a word - everything for which you may need them. RuTvor wooden blanks are distinguished by their quality and low price, because... blanks from the manufacturer. You can order and buy wooden blanks cheaply and in bulk.

“The Russian Land existed before us not for a thousand years, but for many thousands of years,

and there will be more, because we have protected our Land from enemies!”

Prince Kiy

While studying the history of my native country, I had the opportunity to get acquainted with a sufficient amount of materials that illuminate the distant past of Russia in various aspects. In printed literature there are a large number of interpretations of the origin and evolution of the Russian people and the emergence of the first statehood on Russian soil. This is a natural process when researchers try to get to the bottom of the truth. This means that many of them are not satisfied with the current state of affairs in Russian history, which means that there are enough facts that do not fit into the version of the history of the Russian state proposed by academic science. What does our science offer? The clearest example of an academic point of view on Russian history is the book “History. Complete course" (multimedia tutor for preparing for the Unified State Exam, 2013 edition).

In presenting this book, I will simply quote a few excerpts from it, which will allow you, the reader, to understand the essence of the academic concept of Russian history that our science offers. I would add that he not only proposes, but also defends his point of view with all the administrative resources available to science. So, I quote...

“The ancient history of the Slavs contains many RIDDLE(emphasized by the author and further), but from the standpoint of modern historians it comes down to the following. First, in the 3rd - mid-2nd millennium BC. e. SOMEONE Proto-Indo-European community from UNCLEAR areas around the Black Sea (possibly from the Asia Minor peninsula) moved to Europe." And further. “There are several versions of historians about the place where exactly the Slavic community was formed (the theory of the origin of the Slavs): the Carpathian-Danube theory was the first to be put forward (the homeland of the Slavs is the region between the Carpathians and the Danube), in the 20th century. The Vistula-Oder theory was born and became the main one (the Slavs arose north of the Carpathians), then academician B. Rybakov put forward a compromise theory, according to which the Slavs arose SOMEWHERE in Eastern Europe - from the Elbe to the Dnieper. Finally, there is a version that the ancestral home of the Slavs was the Eastern Black Sea region, and their ancestors were one of the branches of the Scythians - the Scythian ploughmen.” Etc. To this it is also necessary to add the explanation of the name of the Slavs made in the book - “comes from the words “word” and “know”, that is, it means people whose language is understandable, in contrast to the “Germans” (as if dumb) - That’s what the Slavs called foreigners.” Agree, all this is very interesting and even entertaining.

I don’t know about you, dear reader, but all these arguments like – A MYSTERY, SOMEONE, UNCLEAR, SOMEWHERE, not only do not satisfy me, but also lead me to believe that this is some kind of deliberate distortion of the existing facts. I proceed from the fact that academic science must have the strength and means to understand and bring clarity and certainty to our history. Judging by the above, there is no clarity and no certainty. Why doesn’t science have it, but I have, although not complete, extensive information about the ancient history of the Russian people. And I outlined my concept of Russian history in the manuscript “On the Ancient History of Russia.” Is it really possible that among our Russian scientific historians there is not a single patriot, not a single decent person who would criticize the lies that have been imposed on us all for about 300 years, and would professionally begin to unravel the “mysteries” posed by science? Otherwise, it's not science. What I presented to you above cannot be called science. Where in the word SLAVS is there or can be seen the meaning of “word”??? Where can we conclude that the word SLAV contains the meaning “to know”??? SLAVYAN means “glorious”. This is the direct and most correct message that comes to mind, and this meaning is already about 5 thousand years old (if not more). But why “glorious”, we need to deal with this. But we have an answer to this question.

There in the book “History. Full Course" explained VERSIONS origin of the word “Rus”: “...or from the name of the Ros River - the right tributary of the Dnieper (this version is proposed academician B. Rybakov, but today is considered obsolete), either from the name of the Varangians (according to the chronicle of Nestor), or from the word “roots”, which means “ship rowers”, which was then transformed into “ruotsi” (modern version).” Dear gentlemen scientists - fear God! We can talk about such things in the 21st century. And the worst thing is that they fill the heads of our children with all this, deliberately forming in them an inferiority complex and dependence on the West.

The presented book further notes. “The most important source on the events of Russian history from ancient times to the beginning of the 12th century. - the first Russian chronicle (the oldest surviving one) - “The Tale of Bygone Years”, the first edition of which was created by the monk of the Kiev-Pechora Monastery Nestor around 1113.” And on this “document” (why it is in quotation marks will become clear a little later) academic science builds its concept of the history of Russia. Yes, there are many other interesting documents that illuminate our ancient history. But for some reason, the chronicle of Nestor is the main one among academicians. Let's see what historians rely on for their delusion. The main message of official science is this. The Russian princely dynasty originated in Novgorod. In 859, the northern Slavic tribes expelled the Varangian Normans (“northern people”), immigrants from Scandinavia, who had recently imposed tribute on them, overseas. However, internecine wars begin in Novgorod. To stop the bloodshed, in 862, at the invitation of the Novgorodians, the Varangian prince Rurik came to “reign.” The Norman squad with its leader was a stabilizing factor in the struggle for power between the boyar families.” To this point of view, we put forward our counterarguments here, refuting the dogmas of academic science:

The Russian princely dynasty arose long before the appearance of Rurik in Novgorod. Previously, Gostomysl ruled there, who was the 19th (!!!) prince from the famous Prince Vandal (Vandalariy - born in 365)

Rurik was the grandson of Gostomysl (the son of Gostomysl's middle daughter), which means that Rurik was Russian by blood.

There were no internecine wars in Novgorod. After Gostomysl’s death, his eldest grandson, Vadim, reigned there. But Rurik was only invited to reign in Ladoga.

Rurik's squad was a destabilizing factor in Rus', with the help of which Rurik and his relatives seized power in Novgorod by force.

It would not occur to any sane person to invite to reign a stranger who has no relation to the current dynasty of princes, much less one of the Normans who had just been expelled from the country overseas and to whom tribute was paid.

All the arguments presented will be revealed a little later. But this is enough to demonstrate that the “most important source” of academic science does not correspond in its content to real events. To this we can also briefly add that Dir and Askold had nothing to do with Rurik, they were not Varangians, much less brothers, as our historical science tells us.

What is “The Tale of Bygone Years”? This is most likely a literary work, not a chronicle. The focus of the chronicler Nestor is the baptism of Rus' by Prince Vladimir from the Rurik family. All events before baptism prepare the reader for this climax, all subsequent ones remind of its importance. Rus' seems to emerge from the darkness of past non-existence shortly before its baptism. The author of “The Tale...” is of little interest in the pre-Christian past of the Slavs, although at his disposal then, 1000 years before us, he probably had historical information, various myths and tales, and possibly manuscripts inherited from the pagan era. It is on such materials and information that have been preserved from those times that we will then build the real history of ancient Rus'. It turns out that Nestor deliberately distorted the history of the Russian people, and in other words, he was fulfilling someone’s order.

Go ahead. Since the chronicle talks about the events of the 12th century, the author did not live earlier. But this raises the question: how could the author, living in a Kiev monastery in the 12th century, know what happened in Veliky Novgorod in the 9th century, given the enormous difficulties of the then roads and the “illiteracy” of the entire country? There is only one answer - he couldn’t!!! Therefore, the entire Nestor Chronicle is a simple composition from the words of other persons or according to rumors from later times. And this is convincingly proven in the book by S. Valyansky and D. Kalyuzhny “The Forgotten History of Rus'.” It says that “the oldest of all the copies of the Tale of Bygone Years - Radzivilovsky - was made only at the beginning of the 17th century. Its pages contain traces of the rough work of a forger, who tore out one sheet, inserted a sheet about the calling of the Varangians, and prepared a place for inserting the lost “chronological sheet.” And this material, fabricated by someone, is taken as a source of knowledge??? And for the reader it will be even more surprising to learn that he found this list, i.e. presented to the whole world by our Tsar Peter Alekseevich, about whom rumors had long circulated in certain circles that the Tsar was “not real.” I mean the moment of “replacement” of the real Tsar Peter, who went to study in Holland, accompanied by 20 (!!!) noble children, and returned from there with only one Menshikov, while everyone else either died or disappeared in the prime of life in Holland. Interesting, isn't it?

In their study, S. Valyansky and D. Kalyuzhny highlighted another interesting fact in the chronicle, which concerns the sexual maturity of our ancestors. It turns out that, in comparison with other princely dynasties, for example Germany and England, “our princes in the period from the 10th to the 12th centuries reached puberty only in the thirtieth year of their lives.” This is so late in comparison with other dynasties that “it is impossible to believe such a chronology, which means that the chronicles depicting the activities of representatives of these dynasties cannot be considered reliable.”

There are other important points related to the content of the chronicle. For example, in Nestor’s chronicle information about comets and eclipses of the moon and sun was not noted or was shifted in time. Also in the chronicle there is no information about the Crusades and, especially, about the “liberation of the Holy Sepulcher from the hands of the infidels.” “What monk would not rejoice on this occasion and would not devote not one, but many pages to this day as a joyful event for the entire Christian world?” But if the chronicler did not see the heavenly eclipses that took place before his eyes, and did not know about the events that thundered throughout the world during his lifetime, then how could he know anything about the prince, who was called 250 years before him? In any case, the so-called “initial chronicle” passes entirely to the position of the late apocrypha,” i.e. works whose authorship is unconfirmed and unlikely. That's how things are.

Let us also refer to the opinion of our first historian V. Tatishchev. He noted that “all Russian historians revered Nestor, the chronicler, as the first and main writer.” But V. Tatishchev did not understand why Nestor himself did not mention any ancient authors, including Bishop Joachim. V. Tatishchev was sure, and from the legends it was clear that ancient stories were written, but they did not reach us. The historian believed unequivocally that long before Nestor there were writers, for example, Joachim of Novgorod. But for some reason his story remained unknown to Nestor. And there is no doubt, according to V. Tatishchev, that the story of Joachim was (that is, existed) by Polish authors, since many cases were not mentioned by Nestor, but by northern (Polish) authors they were. Also, V. Tatishchev noted that “all the manuscripts that he had, although they began with Nestor, but in the continuation, none of them exactly coincided with the other, in one one thing, in another another was added or shortened.”

E. Klassen analyzed in detail the question of what is the basis for the belief about the beginning of the independence of the Russian people or about their statehood only from the time of Rurik’s calling. On the chronicle of Nestor or on the conclusion about his legend by L. Schletser. From the chronicle, the author himself believed, it is clear and undoubtedly clear that the tribes that called the Varangians led a political and state life, since they already formed a union, a community of 4 tribes - Rus', Chud, Slavs, Krivichi, occupying up to 1 million square versts in north-eastern corner of Europe and had cities - Novgorod, Staraya Ladoga, Staraya Rusa, Smolensk, Rostov, Polotsk, Belozersk, Izborsk, Lyubech, Pskov, Vyshgorod, Pereyaslavl. The Bavarian geographer counted 148 (!) cities among the Eastern Slavs. Among the savages, E. Klassen believed, and we agree with him, for such a period of living, one cannot even assume mutual relations, much less unity of thoughts, which was expressed among Rus', Chud, Slavs and Krivichi regarding the summoning of princes to the throne . And most importantly, savages have no cities!

S. Lesnoy also mentioned Nestor in his studies. He noted that “Nestor wrote not so much the history of Rus' or southern Rus', but of the Rurik dynasty. As a comparison with the Joachim and 3rd Novgorod Chronicles shows, Nestor quite deliberately narrowed his history. He almost passed over the history of northern, i.e. Novgorod, Rus' in silence. He was a chronicler of the Rurik dynasty, and his tasks did not at all include the description of other dynasties, so he omitted the history of southern Rus', which had nothing to do with the Rurik dynasty. And most importantly, information about pre-Oleg Rus' could have been preserved by pagan priests or persons clearly hostile to Christianity. But it was monks like Nestor who destroyed the slightest traces reminiscent of paganism.” And also: “Nestor kept silent about this reign (Gostomysl), only mentioning the fact itself. And one can understand why: he wrote a chronicle of southern, Kievan, Rus', and the history of the northern did not interest him. This took him away from the tasks set for him by the church. This is evident from the fact that he considered Oleg to be the first prince in Rus'. He does not consider Rurik a Russian prince, because Novgorod was not called Russian at that time, but was called Slovenian. Perhaps Nestor would not have mentioned Rurik at all if not for his son Igor: it was impossible not to say who his father was.”

This is the actual state of affairs with our ancient history. The fundamental basis of our state history according to academic science is the “Tale of Bygone Years,” which, in fact, is a falsified document - a forgery. This state of affairs with our history was further consolidated by foreigners called by sovereigns to write Russian history. Not only did they not know the Russian language, but they openly despised everything Russian, the country in which they lived. The clearest example is academician L. Schletser (1735 – 1809). Let’s imagine one of Schlozer’s “conclusions” regarding ancient Russian history ( We are talking about the 7th century!!!): “A terrible emptiness reigns everywhere in central and northern Russia. Nowhere is there visible the slightest trace of the cities that now adorn Russia. Nowhere is there any memorable name that would present to the spirit of the historian excellent pictures of the past. Where beautiful fields now delight the eye of a surprised traveler, there before there were only dark forests and swampy swamps. Where enlightened people have now united into peaceful societies, wild animals and semi-wild people lived there before.”

Let's briefly summarize what has been said. Nestor was the ideologist of the Rurik princes, the embodiment of their interests. It was considered unacceptable to admit that the Novgorod princes were older than the Rurikovichs, that the Russian princely dynasty existed long before Rurik. This undermined the Rurikovich’s right to original power, and therefore it was mercilessly eradicated. That is why in The Tale of Bygone Years there is not a word about Slovenia and Rus, who laid the foundation for Russian statehood on the banks of the Volkhov. In the same way, Nestor ignores the last prince of the pre-Rurik dynasty - Gostomysl, a person who is absolutely historical and mentioned in other primary sources, not to mention information from oral folk traditions. That is why “The Tale of Bygone Years” can in no way be considered a source about our antiquity, and our historical science is obliged to recognize this fact and create a real, truthful history of our state in the shortest possible time. Our society needs this so much, it will greatly help in the moral education of our youth, not to mention the fundamental position - without knowing the past, you cannot build the future!

We previously prepared two manuscripts about the facts of ancient Russian history and statehood among the Rus: “On the ancient history of Russia” and “History of the Russians according to the Veles Book.” It presents convincing evidence of the high culture of the ancient Slavs and the presence of statehood among our ancestors long before Rurik’s arrival in Novgorod. This study intends to continue work in this direction in order to present, based on factual data, a version of the history of the Russian people from ancient times. In our work we will rely mainly on chronicle materials, which were not widely circulated and are not perceived by academic science as historical sources. Among them: “The Legend of Sloven and Rus”,

“Genealogy of the Slavic-Russian people, their kings, elders and princes from the ancestor Noah to the Grand Duke Rurik and the princes of Rostov”, “Tales of Zacharikha” and other.

About the sources used

When considering the question of the ancient history of Rus', in our opinion, we must proceed from the following two very important points, which directly affect the construction of the history of the ancient Rus, and, as a consequence, our correct perception of this history.

First,“The Tale of Bygone Years” is not an authentic document and cannot be considered as the main source on the history of ancient Rus'. This is a document deliberately fabricated by the “authors”, which, moreover, was subsequently clearly edited.

Second, The immediate history of the Rus begins 4500 years ago, when on the Russian Plain, as a result of a mutation, a new haplotype arose, an identifier of a man’s ancestral affiliation, which currently affects up to 70% of the total male population of Russia, Ukraine and Belarus. With this in mind, we will further try, with a certain degree of probability, of course (the truth is not achievable), to show the reader the real history of our ancestors, which will be based on a sufficient number of historical facts. We will take the necessary information from the historical sources we have identified. As such sources, we once again note: “The Legend of Sloven and Rus and the city of Slovensk”, Joachim’s Chronicle, “Veles’s Book”, “Genealogy of the Slavic-Russian people, their kings, elders and princes from the ancestor Noah to the Grand Duke Rurik and the princes of Rostov ", "Tales of Zakharikha", "Budinsky Izbornik".

What is the first thing the winner does in occupied territories? That's right, he destroys the history of the captured country. Without destroying people's memory, it is impossible to establish dominance in the occupied territories.

Otherwise, a guerrilla war awaits him, and it always ends in defeat for the occupier. As long as a warrior remembers why he shed blood, it is impossible to turn him into a slave. As soon as a person is deprived of the heritage of his ancestors, he immediately does everything possible to regain what is rightfully his. As soon as a person loses his mind, read - memory, everything becomes indifferent to him. He loses his taste for life, stops creating and goes with the flow, considering himself a hostage to circumstances. Having lost the meaning of existence, a person takes the path of self-destruction, burning himself in idleness, drunkenness, drug addiction, and wallowing in all other types of “legal drugs.” Such as: television series, battles of sports fans, lists of idols, and eternal aimless walking through the desert, to the whistle of the drivers' whips, following a carrot dangling in front of one's nose on a string. “Walking” I call what millions of Egyptologists, Sumerologists, Accadologists and other “OLOGISTS” do, engaged in pouring from empty to empty. Their activities boil down to one thing - to be busy all the time and follow the wrong path, leading further and further from the truth. The main goal of the progressors is to make slaves feel involved in “great” things and not be distracted by what is really happening. The range of tools for this is very wide. From inflating a “sensation” about a buffoon who fancies himself a people’s artist, and believes that he can drunkenly run over people in an expensive car, with purchased licenses in his pocket, to the deliberate creation of all-consuming tragedies, such as “terrorist attacks” with blown up “terrorists” "high-rise buildings and towers of the World Trade Center in New York.

The purpose of all this is one: so that the slaves do not have questions. For example, why does registration at the place of residence still exist, or where does the money from the sale of Russian hydrocarbons to the west and east go, who built this fort and who destroyed it?

This is not a magendawid drawn by little green men in a wheat field, as one might think. These are traces of a fort that was here, but which was razed completely, level with the ground. Those. Do you now understand what the Russian expressions literally mean: - “Leave no stone unturned, and level with damp earth”? Where do you think this was filmed? In France? Germany? Spain? There are a dime a dozen such forts there, and they are all rebuilt and maintained in the best possible condition, but this was filmed... Don’t fall off your chairs. This is the Omsk region!

Once on the ground, you will see this picture. More precisely, you won’t see anything. Not a single stone, block or brick. Everything was dismantled to zero, and taken out!

How much effort and money was spent on this? Is the end really so important that it justifies the means?

There is no doubt that this is so. Target! This is what is most important to understand how this could happen. If you know that the enemy will destroy any reminder of the past of the conquered people, burn archives and books, ban the original religion, destroy culture and art, then it will become clear that the victors razed this fortress to the ground. Who was the loser in that war? Who defended inside this Siberian fortress? We don't know this yet. Perhaps they called themselves Russians, perhaps Tartars, guess what now. I called them Russians. I absolutely do not want to be a Russian. This clumsy, alien name came from the Kremlin, and I do not intend to apply it to myself. Has anything useful ever come from the Kremlin? I remember that the first law that was repealed by the new “democratic” Russian Duma was an article of the USSR Criminal Code providing for punishment for sodomy. Everything fell into place. Pederasts came to power. And is it their laws that I must follow? Have mercy!

So here it is. If the pre-Russians lost in that war, then the Russians won. They won and destroyed everything that allowed the pre-Russians to know about their recent past. If there are forts in Europe to this day, and their existence in Russia has only become known now, then what is the conclusion? Right! The conquerors came from where the forts were intact. If you decided that our scientists know nothing about them, then you are deeply mistaken. Return to the beginning of the article, to the first photo. It is clearly written" - "Protected by law." But the Omsk residents themselves know nothing about this fortress, not to mention the fact that this information simply SHOULD BE known to every schoolchild. But the pitiful, run-down fort "Bayard" is known throughout the world! Science is so same in the hands of the occupiers, like all the usual levers of power.
We, the people of Russia, are slaves of the occupiers who rule the country. We are ruled by the descendants of those who dismantled the defeated forts of Tartaria, they are still at the helm and at the sails, and continue to mock the vanquished. Just like their great-great-great-grandfathers, who made a successful drang nach osten in the eighteenth century.
If you think that the Intercession Fortress is the only one, then I hasten to surprise you. There are thousands, if not tens of thousands, of such forts on Russian territory, and all of them, ALL!!! - Completely destroyed!

If the occupiers at that time knew that they would someday invent cameras and aviation, they would have covered it all with sand. People wander the earth and it doesn’t occur to them what kind of picture opens up from a bird’s eye view.

All the forts presented in this article are located in a very limited space in the Irtysh region. What is written in textbooks about the development of Siberia?

Do you know why reference books do not lie about the fact that these are forts of the eighteenth century, and not earlier ones? Because their fortification speaks for itself. Such “petals” and arrows began to be erected only with the widespread use of artillery. A cannonball or projectile “loves” a perpendicular surface, and from an inclined surface it ricochets and flies towards lunatics or Martians.

Can you imagine how much effort was put into “cleaning up” the area so thoroughly? We might never even discover traces of the former fortification power of the Siberian “savages.” This is how the Romanov occupiers mastered the Urals and Siberia, or, as they truthfully write, “conquered”?

The answer is right before your eyes. this was the first blitzgrig - the rush of the invaders to the east, drang nach osten. Our grandfathers stopped Hitler, but what if they couldn’t? Believe me, they would have done the same thing with the Kremlin as with these forts.

And the intervention of the eighteenth century was only a development of the aggressive war of Comrade Ermak Timofeevich!

Well, chiiiista Ruussky muschiina! If you don’t know who it is, you’ll decide it’s some Vaska da Gama.

In Europe, each fort is built according to an individual project. Siberian forts are typical. Like "Khrushchevs". Do you know what this says? This indicates the existence of standardization at the time of their construction. The specialist will say that this is the stuff of science fiction, and he will be right.

Standards cannot exist in a non-industrialized country. Standards appear where there is continuous production and a unified personnel training system. One, do you understand?

We can also draw a very important conclusion from quantitative indicators. Such a huge number of complex fortification structures suggests that their workers, engineers and designers were not only highly qualified, coupled with a huge number of builders, but also powerful material and human resources, which does not fit into the tales of isolated principalities on the territory of the medieval Rus'.

Only a centralized country with an education and training system capable of mobilizing a gigantic amount of resources, monetary and human, can do this. Having a system of military education and training of soldiers. How do you like this? Looks like a history textbook? They write about endless deserted expanses inhabited by savages who worship wooden idols to the beat of a shaman’s tambourine.

And the conquest lasted more than one century! Until the mid-nineteenth century, pre-Russia tried to throw off the yoke of the invaders. In the series of national liberation wars there are such events as the “peasant uprisings and riots” of Stepan Razin and Emelyan Pugachev.

Stepan Razin. Descendant of Tamerlane, judging by appearance. And no wonder. All this is nonsense, as if a simple Cossack decided to jump on the royal throne. The people followed him precisely because he remained one of the last legal heirs of one of the former rulers of Tartary.

The wars of Peter the Great were also not against “foreigners,” but against the former republics that were part of pre-Russia, which remained faithful to their country and tried to overthrow the power of the occupiers, the door to which was opened by False Peter, who is now called “the great.”

Charles XII. His official title is Ruler of the Goths and Wends. Do you understand? There was no Sweden yet. He was the governor of Tartary in Scandinavia, ruled the Wends (Russians) and the Goths (as the European Tatars were called). And near Poltava, Peter defeated the “federal troops” sent to establish constitutional order in a separate treacherous enclave, with its capital in captured St. Petersburg. Peter is the older brother of Dzhokhar Dudayev. You know who supported the first Chechen general. Do you think that Peter had support from another diaspora?

I dare to suggest that Peter, who dug in in captured St. Petersburg, found himself at the forefront of the treacherous war between the Russians and the Dorossians, who did not even know what they called themselves. I doubt that they are Tartars. Tartaria is not a self-name. That was the name of this country in Europe, which replaced the tsar, and he, like a traitor in a besieged city, opened the gates at night and let in bankers, lawyers, jewelers, priests, “scientists”, tobacconists, vodka workers, homosexuals, lesbians, well, in general, he created a complete tolerance in a barbaric, ignorant country of savages.

Probably the only fort left to us from pre-Russian times is the so-called Peter and Paul Fortress.

It, like St. Petersburg, was not destroyed. It is much easier to take credit for the construction to yourself. But the invaders simply could not explain how it was all built. They did not know anything about such high technologies, so the French in the nineteenth century wrote fairy tales with pictures about the construction of St. Petersburg.

Pay attention to the density of construction of fortifications on the Irtysh alone.

And this is wild, undeveloped Siberia? I don’t understand what we’re talking about!

Were tribes led by shamans able to build this? Yes to completeness! Modern Russia is not capable of this. More precisely, it is capable, but only with the help of guest workers from Moldova and Tajikistan, and then for at least a hundred years.

Well, that’s not all, just a small part! What is the Great Wall of Trans-Volga worth?

It, too, would certainly be covered if they knew that aviation and aerial photography would appear in the future. Scientists say that it was built to repel attacks by Asian nomads on Muscovy. Well, yes, yes... Only the ledges of the towers look in the opposite direction - to the west. Those. the defenders of the wall defended themselves against invasion from the west. Do you know the length of these fortifications? It’s clear, no one knows for sure. But the fact that there were fortifications from Astrakhan to Perm is beyond doubt!

Sorry, I didn't remove the marks on the map, don't let them confuse you. The red line marks the wall. Its length is about two and a half thousand kilometers! Now pick up a calculator. Today, the remains of this wall are on average five meters high, and SEVENTY meters wide! Add a ditch, about ten meters wide and up to four meters deep. Sochi - baby talk! This is simply fantastic, these are unrealistic numbers! And this is only what has survived to this day. Feel free to add thirty percent to these figures, and the Egyptian pyramids simply pale in comparison to the volume of work performed. You feel like a dwarf somehow compared to your ancestors. They did all this without construction mechanization? But I believe it myself, but you can’t argue against the facts. What we see with our own eyes really exists. It's impossible to shrug it off. And this is the history of the country in which we live. Why are historians silent? Where is this information in textbooks? A? Sorry! I forgot that there was an ice age on these lands, and at that time Western civilization flourished... It turns out that the Western “enlightened” civilization, through deception, betrayal and using information attacks, was able to defeat a civilization in the east that was many times higher than it in terms of development. Afterwards I had to invent her story. It’s difficult to invent from scratch, so it’s easier to change the names of key characters and place names. This is precisely what explains the paradox that was discovered and described by the remarkable researcher Andrei Stepanenko chispa1707 , who gave the name to the phenomenon
Don't be lazy, read it. Here it is laid out in a condensed form. you will immediately understand the origin of the Romanov surname RoM - ROME, MAN - MAN. Romanov is literally a man of Rome.

A grain the size of rice, for example, is capable of destroying a modern tank. The only question is how to achieve such speed. The solution to this problem could be helped by the use of the fifth state of matter - plasma. If a plasma “cocoon” is formed around a flying object, a dumbbell, for example, or a teapot, then it is capable of accelerating to speeds many times greater than the speed of sound, and upon colliding with the goal of causing an explosion comparable in power to a nuclear one!
Now, armed with knowledge, we can take a fresh look at the archaic copper (bimetallic) gun, loaded from the barrel, using a spherical STONE core. Copper (Honey) is a very soft and expensive metal. It was cheaper and easier to use cast iron or steel barrels to fire projectiles, but the “ignorant” ancestors persistently cast cannons from copper. Why? Indeed, to increase the service life of the barrels, it was necessary to remove them and make them bimetallic - the barrel was made of iron (less resistant to wear), and the “jacket” was made of copper. What if you know that after gold, copper is quite a suitable conductor? What if you know the properties of minerals to emit microwave radiation? What if we remember the piezoelectric properties of quartz-containing minerals? After all, the very fact that having the opportunity to cast guns, a person made shells from stone is already nonsense! The stone is light, fragile, such properties minimize its damaging properties, and is very labor-intensive to manufacture. Another thing is the cast iron core! Casting - no problem. Heavy, when shooting - just what you need! But no... Stone balls!

So... Copper, electricity, piezoelectricity, perhaps a few more unknown or simply not taken into account “ingredients”, and everything stops seeming so fantastic. Read Raldugin yourself, at least the first page, and you will see that everything is quite scientific. There is every reason to believe that we are dealing with a case where a tomograph ended up in a camp, and they found no other use for it than as a “oppression” for pickling mushrooms. Whoever knew used a bimetallic tube to accelerate a piezoelectric projectile to hypersonic speed, and it destroyed an entire city with one explosion. Is this why there are so many craters and craters with a diameter of up to a kilometer on the territory of Russia, and all the violas are scratching their heads about the origin of them? They think that these are traces of an atomic bomb, but in fact these are traces of shooting from simple copper pipes? Hypersonic kinetic weapons?
Well, why not? After all, then it is logical that the invaders simply did not understand the true purpose of copper cannons. Petrusha the First even ordered all the church bells to be poured into cannons. I thought it would work out now, and his guns would work just like those of the savages he conquered. However, nothing came of it. He did not know that it was not gunpowder that needed to be added as a charge, but something else that created an impulse to fire a piezoelectric projectile. Therefore, over time, copper was abandoned, which is completely logical for pre-Petrine times, if you shoot with simple cannonballs, and with an explosive. And the cannonballs began to be cast from cast iron, which is also absolutely understandable, and the development of artillery began along a dead-end path. Degraded to today's level. This, of course, is only a version, but other, indisputable facts only confirm the version. See for yourself:
The invaders on the lands being developed were strangers, and did not know the essence of geographical names, just as they did not know the history of their origin. That is why some ancient names drive Russians into a stupor. If the village is called Vasilyevo, then no questions arise, but what if the lake is called Alol? What kind of alien language is this? By the way, the most beautiful place in the Pskov region. I recommend it, especially for fans of multi-day kayaking. Alol is the final destination of the route along a rocky, stormy river.
However, let's continue. The invaders, when invading, did not even imagine the size of the land they began to conquer. Here’s an example: In schools and universities, teachers cite Muravyov-Amursky as an example

as a genius of Russian diplomacy, who was able to bloodlessly return the territories previously ceded to China, and thanks to his talents, the border passed along the Amur River. What a blatant lie! This “diplomat” had to be tied to the pillory for a whole day, and then sent to one of the strictest prisons - to the British Isles, the Japanese Isles or Sakhalin. He didn’t even know that he had given the Chinese thousands of square kilometers of primordially Russian lands for free! The border with China was marked on the ground. It is this that is now being passed off as a miracle of the fortification thought of the ancient Chinese. Or maybe he did. Then the Chinese gave him money for a nice house in Miami. I’d rather not say anything about stone processing technologies. This is such an obvious fact that it does not require proof. What pre-Russians could do with stone in Europe they learned to do only at the beginning of the 20th century. But it’s interesting about cast iron. The pre-Russians cast statues from cast iron with walls only one to two centimeters thick. They say that with modern foundry equipment it is possible to achieve such results by casting under high pressure, but practically our contemporaries are not able to repeat anything that the occupiers inherited from pre-Russian times. Not long ago, the triumphal arch in Moscow was dismantled in order to restore it. It almost ended in complete failure. Our luminaries of science and technology could not restore ancient thin-walled cast iron because they themselves do not know how to do this.

There is an even more amazing embarrassment with the supposedly Demidov factories in the Urals.

Nikita Demidov.

This person built the best metallurgical enterprises in the world throughout the Urals? Well, he is not qualified for more than the “most humane” of all professions - the job of a moneylender. No, miracles happen, of course, it happens that hidden talents awaken in people, but judging by the affairs and affairs of this family, far-reaching conclusions can be drawn. Lies, betrayals, bribery, theft, cruelty and promiscuity in methods clearly reveal the true role of the “great industrialists”. Rockefeller and Ford became great businessmen thanks to exactly the same qualities.
So, recently there was information that already in the mid-twentieth century, Soviet engineers were puzzling over the purpose of some machines and mechanisms at the ancient Demidov factories. This is nonsense. How can a person with a higher technical education not understand the principles and purpose of the unit that he holds in his hands, or sees in an abandoned workshop! It’s also worth remembering that even during the Great Patriotic War, many of the industries remained operational and took part in the production of weapons to defeat fascism. Without steam engines and even without electricity, I use the power of rivers and waterfalls. The kinetic energy of flowing water was converted into mechanical energy on an industrial scale. This sounds fantastic, but it is a genuine fact, and I repeat once again, you cannot argue against the facts.
Now I propose in this context to recall the replicated quote from M.V. Lomonosov: - “The Russian land will grow through Siberia”! A completely different meaning is heard in this long-worn phrase, isn’t it?
Well, now, I believe that there will be fewer distrustful people, because the motives and methods of destroying the Russians’ memory of their history have been revealed. Now it is clear why not a single reliable written source has survived before the reign of Peter the Great. True, in the nineteenth century something global happened again, which forced the entire history to be rewritten again, including from Peter to Nicholas II, but this is another topic. If I solve the great mystery of the nineteenth century, I will eat my own hat without salt on air.
Good luck to you all. Teach your children right!

„The Russian land was not a thousand liters before us,
and there were many thousands, and there will still be,
for we have protected our land from the enemy!”

Prince Kiy

INTRODUCTION

While studying the history of my native country, I had the opportunity to get acquainted with a sufficient amount of materials that illuminate the distant past of Russia in various aspects.

In printed literature there are a large number of interpretations of the origin and evolution of the Russian people and the emergence of the first statehood on Russian soil.

This is a natural process when researchers try to get to the bottom of the truth. Means, many of them are not satisfied with the current state of affairs in Russian history, which means that there are enough facts that do not fit into the version of the history of the Russian state proposed by academic science.

What does our science offer? The clearest example of an academic point of view on Russian history is the book “History. Complete course" (multimedia tutor for preparing for the Unified State Exam, 2013 edition).

In introducing this book, I will simply quote a few passages from it that will allow you, the reader, to understand the essence of the academic concept of Russian history, which our the science . I would add that he not only proposes, but also defends his point of view with all the administrative resources available to science.

So, I quote...

« The ancient history of the Slavs contains a lot RIDDLE (emphasis added by the author and below), but from the standpoint of modern historians it comes down to the following.

First, in the 3rd - mid-2nd millennium BC. SOMEONE Proto-Indo-European community from UNCLEAR areas around the Black Sea (possibly from the Asia Minor Peninsula) moved to Europe».

And further. " There are several versions of historians about the place where exactly the Slavic community was formed(theories of the origin of the Slavs): The Carpathian-Danubian theory was the first to be put forward(the homeland of the Slavs is the region between the Carpathians and the Danube), in the 20th century The Vistula-Oder theory was born and became the main one(the Slavs arose north of the Carpathians), then Academician B. Rybakov put forward a compromise theory, according to which the Slavs arose SOMEWHERE in Eastern Europe - from the Elbe to the Dnieper. Finally, there is a version that the ancestral home of the Slavs was the Eastern Black Sea region, and their ancestors were one of the branches of the Scythians - the Scythian plowmen». Etc.

To this it is also necessary to add the explanation of the name of the Slavs produced in the book - “comes from the words “word” and “know”, that is, it means people whose language is understandable, in contrast to “Germans” (as if dumb) - this is how the Slavs called foreigners" . Agree, all this is very interesting and even entertaining.

I don’t know about you, dear reader, but I find all these arguments like - RIDDLES, SOME, UNCLEAR, SOMEWHERE, not only do they not satisfy, but they also suggest that this is some kind of deliberate distortion of the existing facts.

I proceed from the fact that academic science must have the strength and means to understand and bring clarity and certainty to our history. Judging by the above, there is no clarity and no certainty. Why doesn’t science have it, but I have, although not complete, extensive information about the ancient history of the Russian people. And I outlined my concept of Russian history in the manuscript “On the Ancient History of Russia.”

Is it really possible that among our Russian scientific historians there is not a single patriot, not a single decent person who would criticize the lies that have been imposed on us all for about 300 years, and would professionally begin to unravel the “mysteries” posed by science? Otherwise, it's not science. What I presented to you above cannot be called science.

Where in the word SLAVS is there or is the meaning of “word”??? How can we conclude that a word contains SLAVS meaning of “to know”??? SLAVS- means “glorious”. This is the direct and most correct message that comes to mind, and this meaning is already about 5 thousand years old (if not more). But why “glorious”, we need to deal with this. But we have an answer to this question.

There in the book “History. Full Course" explained VERSIONS origin of the word “Rus”: “:... or from the name of the Ros River - the right tributary of the Dnieper(this version was proposed by academician B. Rybakov, but today is considered outdated), or from the name of the Varangians(according to the chronicle of Nestor), or from the word"roots" what does it mean"ship rowers" which then transformed into"ruotsi" (modern version)."

Dear gentlemen scientists - fear God! We can talk about such things in the 21st century. And the worst thing is that they fill the heads of our children with all this, deliberately creating in them an inferiority complex and dependence on the West.

The presented book further notes. " The most important source on the events of Russian history from ancient times to the beginning of the 12th century. - the first Russian chronicle(the oldest surviving) - “The Tale of Bygone Years”, the first edition of which was created by the monk of the Kiev-Pechora Monastery Nestor around 1113." And with that "document"(why it’s in quotes will become clear a little later) academic science is building its own concept of Russian history.

Yes, there are many other interesting documents that illuminate our ancient history. But for some reason, the chronicle of Nestor is the main one among academicians.

Let's see what historians rely on for their delusion. The main message of official science is this. The Russian princely dynasty originated in Novgorod.

In 859, the northern Slavic tribes expelled the Varangian Normans (“northern people”), immigrants from Scandinavia, who had recently imposed tribute on them, overseas. However, internecine wars begin in Novgorod. To stop the bloodshed, in 862, at the invitation of the Novgorodians, the Varangian prince Rurik came to “reign.” The Norman squad with its leader was a stabilizing factor in the struggle for power between the boyar families.”

To this point of view we put forward our counterarguments here, refuting the dogmas of academic science:

Rurik was the grandson of Gostomysl (the son of Gostomysl's middle daughter), which means that Rurik was Russian by blood.

There were no internecine wars in Novgorod. After Gostomysl’s death, his eldest grandson, Vadim, reigned there. But Rurik was only invited to reign in Ladoga.

Rurik's squad was a destabilizing factor in Rus', with the help of which Rurik and his relatives seized power in Novgorod by force.

What is “The Tale of Bygone Years”? This is most likely a literary work, not a chronicle.

The focus of the chronicler Nestor is the baptism of Rus' by Prince Vladimir from the Rurik family. All events before baptism prepare the reader for this climax, all subsequent ones remind of its importance. Rus' seems to emerge from the darkness of past non-existence shortly before its baptism.

The author of “The Tale...” is of little interest in the pre-Christian past of the Slavs, although at his disposal then, 1000 years before us, he probably had historical information, various myths and tales, and possibly manuscripts inherited from the pagan era. It is on such materials and information that have been preserved from those times that we will then build the real history of ancient Rus'. It turns out that Nestor deliberately distorted the history of the Russian people, and in other words, he was fulfilling someone’s order.

There is only one answer - he couldn’t! !! Therefore, the entire Nestor Chronicle is a simple composition from the words of other persons or according to rumors from later times. And this is convincingly proven in the book by S. Valyansky and D. Kalyuzhny “The Forgotten History of Rus'.”

It says that “the oldest of all the copies of the Tale of Bygone Years - Radzivilovsky - was made only at the beginning of the 17th century. Its pages contain traces of the rough work of a forger, who tore out one sheet, inserted a sheet about the calling of the Varangians, and prepared a place for inserting the lost “chronological sheet.” And this material, fabricated by someone, is taken as a source of knowledge???

And for the reader it will be even more surprising to learn that he found this list, i.e. presented to the whole world by our Tsar Peter Alekseevich, about whom rumors had long circulated in certain circles that the Tsar was “not real.” I mean the moment of “replacement” of the real Tsar Peter, who went to study in Holland, accompanied by 20 (!!!) noble children, and returned from there with only one Menshikov, while everyone else either died or disappeared in the prime of life in Holland. Interesting, isn't it?

In their study, S. Valyansky and D. Kalyuzhny highlighted another interesting fact in the chronicle, which concerns the sexual maturity of our ancestors.

It turns out that, in comparison with other princely dynasties, for example Germany and England, “our princes in the period from the 10th to the 12th centuries reached puberty only in the thirtieth year of their lives.” This is so late in comparison with other dynasties that “it is impossible to believe such a chronology, which means that the chronicles depicting the activities of representatives of these dynasties cannot be considered reliable.”

But if the chronicler did not see the heavenly eclipses that took place before his eyes, and did not know about the events that thundered throughout the world during his lifetime, then how could he know anything about the prince, who was called 250 years before him? In any case, the so-called “initial chronicle” passes entirely to the position of the late apocrypha,” i.e. works whose authorship is unconfirmed and unlikely. That's how things are.

V. Tatishchev was sure, and from the legends it was clear that ancient stories were written, but they did not reach us. The historian believed unequivocally that long before Nestor there were writers, for example, Joachim of Novgorod. But for some reason his story remained unknown to Nestor.

And there is no doubt, according to V. Tatishchev, that the story of Joachim was (that is, existed) by Polish authors, since many cases were not mentioned by Nestor, but by northern (Polish) authors they were. Also V. Tatishchev noted that “ all the manuscripts that he had, although they began with Nestor, but in their continuation, none of them exactly agreed with the other, in one one, in the other another is added or reduced ».

From the chronicle, the author himself believed, it is clear and undeniable that the tribes that called the Varangians led a political life, state, since they already constituted an alliance, a community of 4 tribes - Rus', Chud, Slavs, Krivichi, which occupied up to 1 million square miles in the north-eastern corner of Europe and had cities - Novgorod, Staraya Ladoga, Staraya Rusa, Smolensk, Rostov, Polotsk, Belozersk, Izborsk, Lyubech, Pskov, Vyshgorod, Pereyaslavl.

The Bavarian geographer calculated 148 (!) cities among the Eastern Slavs. Among the savages, E. Klassen believed, and we agree with him, for such a period of living, one cannot even assume mutual relations, much less unity of thoughts, which was expressed among Rus', Chud, Slavs and Krivichi regarding the summoning of princes to the throne . And the most important thing, savages have no cities!

S. Lesnoy also mentioned Nestor in his studies. He noted that " Nestor wrote not so much the history of Rus' or southern Rus', but of the Rurik dynasty. As a comparison with the Joachim and 3rd Novgorod Chronicles shows, Nestor quite deliberately narrowed his history. The history of the north, i.e. He almost passed over Novgorod Rus' in silence.

He was a chronicler of the Rurik dynasty, and his tasks did not at all include a description of other dynasties, so he omitted the history of southern Rus', which has nothing to do with the Rurik dynasty. And most importantly, information about pre-Oleg Rus' could have been preserved by pagan priests or persons clearly hostile to Christianity. But it was monks like Nestor who destroyed the slightest traces reminiscent of paganism ».

And: " Nestor kept silent about this reign(Gostomysl), just mentioning the fact itself. And one can understand why: he wrote a chronicle of southern, Kievan, Rus', and the history of the northern did not interest him. It led him astray from the tasks assigned to him by the church.

This is evident from the fact that he considered Oleg to be the first prince in Rus'. He does not consider Rurik a Russian prince, because Novgorod was not called Russian at that time, but was called Slovenian. Perhaps Nestor would not have mentioned Rurik at all if not for his son Igor: it was impossible not to say who his father was.”

This is the actual state of affairs with our ancient history. The fundamental basis of our state history according to academic science is the “Tale of Bygone Years,” which, in essence, is falsified document - forgery.

We consolidated this state of affairs with our history further Foreigners, called by the sovereigns to write Russian history. Not only did they not know the Russian language, but they openly despised everything Russian, the country in which they lived.

The clearest example is academician L. Schletser (1735 - 1809). Let’s imagine one of Schletzer’s “conclusions” regarding ancient Russian history (we are talking about the 7th century!!!):

« A terrible emptiness reigns everywhere in central and northern Russia. Not the slightest trace of cities is visible anywhere, which now adorn Russia. Nowhere is there any memorable name that would present to the spirit of the historian excellent pictures of the past. Where beautiful fields now delight the eye of a surprised traveler, there before there were only dark forests and swampy swamps. Where enlightened people have now united into peaceful societies, there once lived wild animals and half-wild people ».

Let's briefly summarize what has been said. Nestor was the ideologist of the Rurik princes, the embodiment of their interests. Recognize that the Novgorod princes are older than the Rurikovichs, that the Russian princely dynasty existed long before Rurik, - was considered unacceptable.

This undermined the Rurikovich’s right to original power, and therefore it was mercilessly eradicated. That is why in The Tale of Bygone Years there is not a word about Slovenia and Rus, who laid the foundation for Russian statehood on the banks of the Volkhov.

In the same way, Nestor ignores the last prince of the pre-Rurik dynasty - Gostomysl, a person who is absolutely historical and mentioned in other primary sources, not to mention information from oral folk traditions.

That is why The Tale of Bygone Years can in no way be considered a source about our antiquity, and our historical science is obliged to recognize this fact and create a real, truthful history in the shortest possible time of our state. Our society needs this so much, it will greatly help in the moral education of our youth, not to mention the fundamental position - without knowing the past, you cannot build the future!

It presents convincing evidence of the high culture of the ancient Slavs and the presence of statehood among our ancestors long before Rurik’s arrival in Novgorod. This study intends to continue work in this direction in order to present, based on factual data, a version of the history of the Russian people from ancient times.

In our work we will rely mainly on chronicle materials, which were not widely circulated and are not perceived by academic science as historical sources. Among them: “The Tale of Sloven and Rus”, “Veles’s Book”, “Budino Izbornik”, “Genealogy of the Slavic-Russian people, their kings, elders and princes from the progenitor Noah to the Grand Duke Rurik and the princes of Rostov”, “Tales of Zachary” and others.

***

You can download the book.

Ancient Rus' was never Marcel Ivanovich's specialty. But it was during this period that someone’s evil will abandoned him. The Slavic Magi are still a formidable force, dashing people on the roads do whatever they want, any mistake can cost their lives. How can a city dweller survive in such conditions...

I am my own squad!

He was born with the blessing of the God of Wars and named after his father's sword. He killed his first enemy at the age of nine, and at fourteen he underwent Perun’s initiation and put on the military hryvnia. He has absorbed with his mother’s milk hatred of the damned Khazar yoke and is ready to give his life for the liberation of his native land from “when...

A new pagan action film from the author of the bestsellers “Svyatoslav the Brave”, “Evpatiy Kolovrat” and “Pagan Rus'”! The Slavic tribes, united under the banner of the great Svyatoslav, throw off the hated Khazar yoke! The sacred Kolovrat against the damned star! The Russian army, blocking the Wild Field of Worms...

A new fantastic action movie from the author of the best-selling books “Time Detachment”, “Time Penal Battalion” and “Submarine Navigator”! An alien from the future floats down the stream of Eternity - from the 21st century to the 15th century. The rescue of drowning “accidents” is the work of the “accidents” themselves! Having almost gone down these days, he...

Absent

The book is the author's reflection on the origins and fate of Russian Civilization, on its genetic place on the Eurasian continent, on its confrontation with Western Civilization, and directly on its bearer - the Russian people. The Russian people in the book are opposed to alien power...

Absent

Dear reader, you have just picked up a book that contains not knowledge, but a rather gloomy story about how a person has to fight his eternal enemy day after day, year after year, for many centuries. , known as fear. Nowadays, any of our actions...

People forgot the old law, rejected their gods. So now they live according to foreign laws, worship foreign faith. If you betray once, you will betray again. Maybe that’s why the Russian people live in hardship and hardship? What can you do to prevent poor choices? Where to throw a stone on the trodden...

What will you decide to do if you have a time machine at your disposal that opens a portal to the year 881? Would you take a selfie with Oleg the Prophet? But Igor Tuchin has much grander plans! He wants to help the prince train a powerful regular army, defeat the Khazars, begin industrialization, bring out his ancestral army...

Waking up in an unfamiliar forest, what will you do? Most likely, you will first try to understand where you ended up? And what to do to get to habitable places? So Vladimir, realizing that he was in a strange forest and at a different time, begins to ask himself questions. Why and why was he here? Where is the way...

Absent

“...Whoever has not come to the spacious princely mansion, recently built on the top of a picturesque hill in the very heart of the Kyiv mountains. Slavic princes came from the lands of the Krivichi and Vyatichi, the Novgorod Slovenes and Radimichi, from the Drevlyansky forests and meadows of the Tivertsy; the feud with Oleg was left behind...

Absent

Ideas that are traced in the context of history and in the life of an ordinary person - is it regularity or irregularity? What is the essence of our choices and choices, as it sews together the fabric of the past and the future? Chi skin c...

Absent

Ladoga, end of the 9th century. Voivode Domagost has three daughters. The eldest, Yaromila, Volkhov's Lela, is destined to meet Prince Odd Khaleig: this is how the one who will be called the Prophetic Oleg appears in Rus'. The middle one, Divlyana, fell in love with the Pskov prince Volga, but at this time matchmakers come to Ladoga, wanting...

Absent

“Shoot Batu!” - the first thing that comes to mind for our contemporary, abandoned with a sniper rifle during the era of the Tatar-Mongol invasion. But will the “hitman” be able to get close to Khan’s headquarters for an aimed shot? And most importantly, will the death of the great conqueror stop the steppe avalanche? Or …

NEW book from the bestselling author of “Black Archaeologist from the Future” and “Freebooter of Time”! A continuation of the adventures of our contemporary, abandoned in the 17th century and becoming a Cossack, a pirate of the Black Sea, a destroyer of the steppe hordes and Ottoman slave traders. You say, “We don’t need the Turkish coast”? Damn...

The owner of a large St. Petersburg PR agency, Vasily Zubov, decided to hunt wolves. How could the PR man know that the gray predator he liked was not an animal at all, but the insidious sorcerer Prostomir? And was it not through his spell that Vasily was transported to an alternative Ancient Rus' right at the beginning of the election campaign...

9th century Ancient Rus'. Leaving her home, the red-haired beauty Divlyana, betrothed to Prince Askold, was afraid to even imagine what awaited her on the long journey from Ladoga to Kyiv. Saving Divlyana from the attacks of the Krivichi prince Stanislav, her brother Velem found another girl, a slave, and slipped her to...

He was a useless disabled person who felt that his life was coming to an end. But fate gave him a second chance to start all over again, and retired FSB officer Vadim Sokolov finds himself in the past. Twelfth century. He is young and strong again. However, where should he go and what should he do? Can …

The war continues. Once again, the Catholics gather huge armies of crusaders and try to defeat the Venedian Union. Cities are burning again and crops are being trampled, women and children are crying, and men with weapons in their hands meet enemies and die in battles. To survive, the Wends need the help of their allies, and Vitya...

If, at the height of the war against the Poles during the siege of Smolensk, Tsar Alexei Mikhailovich fell seriously ill, who will save him from certain death? The English court doctor only knows how to bleed. And then a WITCHMAN FROM THE FUTURE comes to the rescue, thrown into the Moscow Kingdom from our time. But you...

New adventures of our contemporary in the distant past. A Russian government communications courier abandoned in Ancient Rus' changes his profession. He will have to become a warrior of the Moscow prince and a Novgorod ushkuinnik, serve at the border outpost and go on sea voyages against the Swedes, assaults...

He is transported 1000 years into the past by the will of the pagan gods in order to lead an uprising against Christians who baptized Rus' “with fire and sword.” Finding himself in the 11th century AD, he took the name RATIBOR in honor of the hero of his favorite novel, entered into an alliance with the Magi and led the pagans into battle. But is it possible...

Absent

Kievan Rus, 997. On the edge of the Pecheneg steppe, Prince Vladimir built Belgorod - a shield city obscuring the Russian land. The foreman Yavor is the first daredevil in the city, respected by the squad and loved by the governor, and only the spoiled and frivolous beauty Medvyanka does not want to recognize his worth...

During the bloody reign of Ivan the Terrible, the oprichniki were popularly called the pitch-men - such was the utter horror they brought upon the country. But our contemporary, abandoned in this merciless era, himself will create absolute hell for the royal punishers! He will shoot the guardsmen like mad dogs. It will become a mystery...

Battles with steppe inhabitants on the borders of the Wild Field and a campaign against Lithuania, battles with English pirates and the assault on Smolensk - fate continues to test the strength of our contemporary, abandoned in the Muscovite Kingdom. Awarded a boyar title for faithful service, he takes fencing lessons to become...

A new action movie about the prehistory of Rus' and the exploits of our distant ancestors. Slavic tribes unite around the sacred Perunov temple, creating the first Russian state - Ruskolan. But in order to become the heirs of the great Scythian power, the Rus must rebel against the nomadic Huns and throw off their hatred...

Slavic Kolovrat against the Khazar star. Russian squads against countless hordes. An indestructible wall of scarlet shields against the Wild Field. Having united under the banner of Prince Svyatoslav, the Slavic tribes threw off the hated Khazar yoke. The menacing battle cry of the Rus drowns out the heart-rending scream of the steppe...

The Urals region of the mid-first millennium AD, where the Slavs, Volga Bulgars and Finno-Ugrians coexist. As a result of a scientific experiment, a former investigator with an engineering education and experience as a production worker ended up here. But they didn’t expect a stranger here... Having survived several battles with Abor...